| Local
News |
||||||||
|
Wednesday,
February 27, 2008 It's going to be a busy week. The state wrestling tournament is Wednesday through Friday, the girls basketball section tournament starts on Tuesday and the boys are finishing their regular season this week. Good luck to all the area teams. We all should try to find some time to get out and support them. Last week I mentioned The Eagle Valley school district building project. In doing a little research around the state I found other schools dealing with some of the same issues. In the Iron Range, the Mountain Iron-Buhl school district is having a study done on whether to fix their school or build new. Their study, being done by Architectural Resources, advised them that when costs start to reach 60 percent of its replacement cost that experts may recommend a new facility. Aging buildings and energy inefficiency are issues many school districts in the state are trying to address. This is why I believe we should have an architect helping with the planning process. We need someone innovative and with experience in school projects. I think we need to look at our project as something fun and a way to make a change for the better for years to come. To do this we need an architect to lead us. Architects who specialize in school design are becoming increasingly savvy about best practices in education and provide designs that break the mold of the "big box" schools most American children still attend. Let's make our school an inviting campus and include laptop computers for all high school students in this change and give our students the technological edge. This will retain and more than likely increase enrollment. Last week I said I would provide a list of pros and cons of the project options. So here goes. This includes comments I have heard on the three different options of getting into one building. 1. Converting Eagle Valley Elementary
to Pre-K through 12.
3. Building a new Pre-K through 12 school.
|
Ray,
I think maybe some of the points you refer to in your editorial,
may be a little one sided, and i understand everyone has the right
to an opinion. I feel these little tidbits may just seperate the
towns, on an issue that is very important and tempermental at
this stage of the process. Yes in all honesty we do need to do
something but we should not be pointing negativity towards one
location or another, we should be working together towards a common
and efficient goal. Just FYI as a reader, taxpayer,parent and
grandparent of present and future EV students. You may find out
and will hear many comments on this article as I have, and not
all are good. I respect very much the investigative work you have
done, but feel your article was a bit to premature.
Steve